Amaral's new book

[jjbd]

Apparently Amaral is bringing out a new book in Oct.

There is a very disturbing post by Verdi in the cesspit. Someone asking when the book will be published had this reply:

Be patient .... all will be revealed in due course.

This project has been a long time in the making, a few more weeks won't make much difference smilie .

And then

by PeterMac Today at 8:57
GA has permitted us to announce that his new book is being printed, and will be released on 2nd October.
Details of the Cover, the Title and the Publisher will be released soon.

So is it going to be a cesspit publication?

[honestbroker1]

2nd October is Amaral's birthday.

[Whiterose]

Wasn't it supposed to be about the UK's police or something. Lets see how much he gets wrong this time.

[jjbd]

bennett has tweeted that he has been told (about the book) that:

"it is very likely to discuss the evidence supporting the theory that Maddie died on Sunday 29 April & that there has been a massive #CoverUp

[sal]

Well if he stands by what he said in Amsterdam plod and co will be disappointed

05 May 2009



Whilst in Amsterdam, for the launch of the Dutch version of his book 'A Verdade da Mentira', Gonçalo Amaral took time out to answer some questions.



The questions/answers are not verbatim but from notes:



Q: Have you considered the possibility that Madeleine died on the previous night or even when Mrs. Fenn heard the crying?



A: Naturally - the investigation begins with establishing if the person who disappeared, does actually exist and then, who was the last person to see her - the investigation shows clearly that she was last seen around 17.30.



Q: Have you any doubt as to the validity of Madeleine attending the creche on 3/5?



A: No doubt whatsoever.

[jjbd]

Well if he stands by what he said in Amsterdam plod and co will be disappointed

05 May 2009



Whilst in Amsterdam, for the launch of the Dutch version of his book 'A Verdade da Mentira', Gonçalo Amaral took time out to answer some questions.



The questions/answers are not verbatim but from notes:



Q: Have you considered the possibility that Madeleine died on the previous night or even when Mrs. Fenn heard the crying?



A: Naturally - the investigation begins with establishing if the person who disappeared, does actually exist and then, who was the last person to see her - the investigation shows clearly that she was last seen around 17.30.



Q: Have you any doubt as to the validity of Madeleine attending the creche on 3/5?



A: No doubt whatsoever.

Exactly sal - but was he in touch with the cesspit idiots back then? Apparently Murky Mac is in direct contact with him!

[sal]

He was interviewed by Kazlux and most of the questions came from 3a

....and haverns says there will be an English version.of the new book

The 4 of us, bloggers, were shown in a room and when the Amaral couple came in, mrs. Amaral immediately asked who it was that set up the poll on the 3Arguidos?
When somebody in the company said not to know 3A she showed surprise and said that it was an important forum, she reads it often only has no time to post.
(later I asked her permission to quote her on this, and also on posting her picture, and she said of course, you can quote anything you like).

[Whiterose]

bennett has tweeted that he has been told (about the book) that:

"it is very likely to discuss the evidence supporting the theory that Maddie died on Sunday 29 April & that there has been a massive #CoverUp

Oh dear, he must be very desperate or has finally flipped

[Cath]

bennett has tweeted that he has been told (about the book) that:

"it is very likely to discuss the evidence supporting the theory that Maddie died on Sunday 29 April & that there has been a massive #CoverUp

Oh dear, he must be very desperate or has finally flipped

He needs money and knows there’s still plenty of fools who buy his lies.

[jjbd]

From current information it is apparent that Murky Mac and bennett were both wrong.

Or are they liars?

[sal]

I do intend to get the book when it comes out and I might start a new thread in the "Anglo-Portuguese Alliance" sub-forum, giving an overview of the information that the book presents.

As Jill said, I think it's best to translate the most important parts for research purposes.

I hope there is new information...

The only thing new will be a twist on his usual progaganda.
How many years have we waited for the ace

[honestbroker1]

I do intend to get the book when it comes out and I might start a new thread in the "Anglo-Portuguese Alliance" sub-forum, giving an overview of the information that the book presents.

As Jill said, I think it's best to translate the most important parts for research purposes.

I hope there is new information...

The only thing new will be a twist on his usual progaganda.
How many years have we waited for the ace

Amaral's ace has been played. A corrupt Portuguese judicial ruling that'll keep him in smokes and alcohol until his dying day.

[jjbd]

and now this:

Re: Gonçalo Amaral - new book coming soon.
Post by Tony Bennett Today at 11:55
Well, this is tantalising.

The synopsis asks: "Death in the hours or days prior to the missing person alert?"

Wonderful, or at least, promising.

But then the synopsis says: "But there is already a suspect".

Does that mean he is just going on to discuss Christian Bruckner, and then proceed to rule him out?

I am looking for Goncalo to set out in his book COMPELLING NEW EVIDENCE that something happened to Madeleine much earlier in the week...FACTUAL evidence that will force a reinvestigation by the Attorney-General and the PJ.

Here's hoping...

But but - Murky Mac is in email contact with Gonc - it's almost as if they have no idea!

bennett the blonk's idea of FACTUAL evidence is to accuse everyone who saw Madeleine of being liars.

[Whiterose]

and now this:

Re: Gonçalo Amaral - new book coming soon.
Post by Tony Bennett Today at 11:55
Well, this is tantalising.

The synopsis asks: "Death in the hours or days prior to the missing person alert?"

Wonderful, or at least, promising.

But then the synopsis says: "But there is already a suspect".

Does that mean he is just going on to discuss Christian Bruckner, and then proceed to rule him out?

I am looking for Goncalo to set out in his book COMPELLING NEW EVIDENCE that something happened to Madeleine much earlier in the week...FACTUAL evidence that will force a reinvestigation by the Attorney-General and the PJ.

Here's hoping...

But but - Murky Mac is in email contact with Gonc - it's almost as if they have no idea!

bennett the blonk's idea of FACTUAL evidence is to accuse everyone who saw Madeleine of being liars.

They are hoping Amaral is going to agree with them in his book. What will happen if he doesn't I wonder.

[sal]

If Amaral hints in their favour, he will be seen as a loon amongst his colleagues .
If he confirms what he has always said about the 5.30 timeline, the ace researchers will carry on with their usual mantra, but he left the investigation after 6 months, so................
I wouldn't put anything passed him, he loves getting that wooden spoon out to cause doubt and dissent.

The rog letters also mention the 5.30 timeline, and they weren't written by him.

[honestbroker1]

If Amaral hints in their favour, he will be seen as a loon amongst his colleagues .
If he confirms what he has always said about the 5.30 timeline, the ace researchers will carry on with their usual mantra, but he left the investigation after 6 months, so................
I wouldn't put anything passed him, he loves getting that wooden spoon out to cause doubt and dissent.

The rog letters also mention the 5.30 timeline, and they weren't written by him.

They were, at least in part, written by Levy and/or Blacksmith.

[sal]

I am not talking about the rog interviews.
It is the rog letters sent to the UK laying out the details of the case.

[Whiterose]

If Amaral hints in their favour, he will be seen as a loon amongst his colleagues .
If he confirms what he has always said about the 5.30 timeline, the ace researchers will carry on with their usual mantra, but he left the investigation after 6 months, so................
I wouldn't put anything passed him, he loves getting that wooden spoon out to cause doubt and dissent.

The rog letters also mention the 5.30 timeline, and they weren't written by him.

I bet he was wondering what to put in his book. Does he agree with the loonies or not, we'll have to wait and see

[jjbd]

Morais has issued a handy 18 step guide to pre-order gonc's new book.
https://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t1718 ... -pt#443326

[sal]

Jo said that if Amaral continues to accuse the McCanns and rubbishes every investigation bar his own flawed investigation she will translate the upcoming interview.

Wasn't it the other week when he made an exception to speak to Bild as he no longer gave interviews.....oops sorry he has a book to sell

[jjbd]

[jjbd]

Maybe Levy will be back soon with dodgy videos!

[scoobydoo]

The press are going to crucify them in the next couple of years, especially if they do actually convict CB. And it won't be simply all g the "eccentric loon or trolls" storyline either if they are not careful. It's looking like the any trial will be horrifying and the media will need to go after anyone to make their own initial behave look better. So they will go through everything, that nasty little letter in Madeleine's voice, the Christmas songs making fun of the disappearance, that nasty little sketch about April Jones, the claims that pictures of Madeleine smiling were sexually alluring (a come f*** me smile one referred to it as). We are talking about friends and neighbours and workplaces being asked to comment. The world will be baying for blood and it won't be enough to just have CB imprisoned, one target for the rage won't be enough.

[jjbd]

Madeleine McCann - Gonçalo Amaral revela que Maddie tinha problemas de expressão

To a daily newspaper, the former inspector of the Judiciary Police (PJ) assures that the British authorities realized that Maddie, who at the time was four years old, experienced these difficulties after questioning her mother, Kate McCann. "The British police had a database for children in this age group, which had to do with how they referred to a certain object. They asked the mother questions and she mentioned, for example, how the girl said 'chair' , 'pee', and they concluded, from the phrases her mother used to say, that there was some problem with Maddie there," explained Gonçalo Amaral to Correio da Manhã.

On the CM Jornal - Investigação CM on the television channel where GA talked he actually stated that those "difficulties" discovered on MM way to express were most likely due to sexual abuse (of course prior to abduction). Then he mentioned David Payne as well ...

This is a strange post on websleuths - I have not seen any further details anywhere.

[sal]

https://www.vip.pt/madeleine-mccann-gon ... -expressao