bennett rubishes Amaral

[jjbd]

#170

Gonçalo Amaral New Book: General Discussion. - Page 7 Empty Re: Gonçalo Amaral New Book: General Discussion.

Post by Tony Bennett Today at 17:17

We know that Petermac here has tried to guide Goncalo as to the evidence that suggests that something serious must have happened to Madeleine soon after Sunday lunch-time. Goncalo appears to know that the Last Photo was taken Sunday, not Thursday, a fact which is HUGE in this case.

Moreover, Goncalo has said on the record that he has passed to the Attorney-General the conclusions of the MMRG and recommended that the PJ carry out a re-investigaton.

All well and good so far.

But, Goncalo, can you not see that the Last Photo evidence and much more besides means that YOU MUST now reject the conclusion of you and your team in September 2007 that Madeleine was alive and well and having a nice high tea with her Mum, Dad and Catriona Baker at 5.30pm on Thursday 3 May 2007.

That is in black-and-white in Tavares de Almeida's interim report of 10 September 2007.

Unless and until you call that out as untrue, unless you realise that you were terribly misled about that event actually taking place, unfortunately you are not able to help us here in trying to determine what really happened to Madeleine McCann.

It is time that you had a thorough look at all the evidence we have accumulated here on CMOMM and in Petermac's ebook.

https://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t1718 ... ion#446631

[sal]

Verdi not too happy either

I'm disappointed, it reads to me like a condescending passing remark to appease - Dr Amaral doesn't appear to give it much credence. It's tantamount to saying all angles must be explored by an investigation - no matter how bizarre.

I guess it was too much to hope he might re-think the Smith family evidence and other significant areas.

Add to that, if the new book is really only a reiteration of Dr Amaral's 'The Truth of the Lie', all I can wish or hope for now is knowledge of information previously undisclosed.

verdi appears on the ball with that one

[honestbroker1]

If Amaral has disgruntled his most rabid followers, he has, at last, achieved something worthy of note.

[Whiterose]

If Amaral has disgruntled his most rabid followers, he has, at last, achieved something worthy of note.

[jjbd]

If Amaral has disgruntled his most rabid followers, he has, at last, achieved something worthy of note.

I agree hb and this certainly put a stop to the translations on the cesspit:

by Jill Havern 28.10.21 11:35
And his second book is NOT 'freely' available either - Snr Amaral has NOT given permission for his new book to be translated by anyone other than his publisher.

so sod off cesspit.

[Whiterose]

If Amaral has disgruntled his most rabid followers, he has, at last, achieved something worthy of note.

I agree hb and this certainly put a stop to the translations on the cesspit:

by Jill Havern 28.10.21 11:35
And his second book is NOT 'freely' available either - Snr Amaral has NOT given permission for his new book to be translated by anyone other than his publisher.

so sod off cesspit.

Oh dear he doesn't want it translated what a kick in the teeth

[Alibongo]

The cesspit has outlived it's usefulness for Amaral, I suspect he's long thought them ridiculous but they made him money.

[scoobydoo]

I think he was under the impression that Bennet was some hot shot legal expert, and was surely disappointed.

[Carana]

#170

Gonçalo Amaral New Book: General Discussion. - Page 7 Empty Re: Gonçalo Amaral New Book: General Discussion.

Post by Tony Bennett Today at 17:17

We know that Petermac here has tried to guide Goncalo as to the evidence that suggests that something serious must have happened to Madeleine soon after Sunday lunch-time. Goncalo appears to know that the Last Photo was taken Sunday, not Thursday, a fact which is HUGE in this case.

Moreover, Goncalo has said on the record that he has passed to the Attorney-General the conclusions of the MMRG and recommended that the PJ carry out a re-investigaton.

All well and good so far.

But, Goncalo, can you not see that the Last Photo evidence and much more besides means that YOU MUST now reject the conclusion of you and your team in September 2007 that Madeleine was alive and well and having a nice high tea with her Mum, Dad and Catriona Baker at 5.30pm on Thursday 3 May 2007.

That is in black-and-white in Tavares de Almeida's interim report of 10 September 2007.

Unless and until you call that out as untrue, unless you realise that you were terribly misled about that event actually taking place, unfortunately you are not able to help us here in trying to determine what really happened to Madeleine McCann.

It is time that you had a thorough look at all the evidence we have accumulated here on CMOMM and in Petermac's ebook.

https://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t1718 ... ion#446631

Oh.

[Alibongo]

[jjbd]

Confusion at the cesspit:

by Jill Havern 28.10.21 11:35
And his second book is NOT 'freely' available either - Snr Amaral has NOT given permission for his new book to be translated by anyone other than his publisher.

He has, however, been made aware of this pirated version.

Then Murky McLeod - (who don't forget has been "guiding" gonc) says:

by PeterMac 19.12.21 14:51
Many of us HAVE the book, and have read it either in the original or in translation, which is available on the net for anyone with the will to find it.

https://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t1718 ... ion#447719

Are they not friends anymore?
Are they trying to screw gonc out of income?

[Whiterose]