Grime-watch ....

User avatar
honestbroker1
Posts: 8052
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 8:50 pm

Re: Grime-watch ....

Post by honestbroker1 » Fri Nov 02, 2018 8:37 am

Grime lied.

His profile is not dated.

Mark Harrison's profile is dated

23 July 2007

http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/P9/09_VO ... e_2224.jpg

Martin Grime's profile is undated

https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/VOLU ... o_2262.jpg

Why?

User avatar
honestbroker1
Posts: 8052
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 8:50 pm

Re: Grime-watch ....

Post by honestbroker1 » Mon Nov 05, 2018 9:41 am

http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/ANALY ... OLUMES.htm

(Sic)
It should be noted the report made by the trainer /owner of these dogs.
Trainer/owner.

The semantically correct description of freelance Martin Grime.

User avatar
honestbroker1
Posts: 8052
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 8:50 pm

Re: Grime-watch ....

Post by honestbroker1 » Mon Mar 02, 2020 2:21 pm

This is interesting:

https://www.crime-scene-investigator.ne ... rdogs.html
Each investigation must be handled as though the area(s) to be searched will be a crime scene. Not only must an accurate written record of the HRD team activities be made, but the team must conduct their search so as not to disturb or alter crime scene evidence. For example, some of the techniques used by conscientious HRD teams include use of canines that display a passive trained alert behavior when locating the odor of human remains. The passive response might consist of the dog assuming a supine position or sitting as close as it can get to the source of the odor. The passive alert involves no action on the part of either team member that would destroy evidence. It is also critical that the HRD team recognize the functions of other specialty units involved as a death investigation progresses. Not only must the team endeavor not to damage anything during their part of the investigation, they must utilize flags or other recognizable means of marking sites requiring further investigation and communicate their needs and methods clearly. A written record as well as a verbal explanation of the HRD teams methods or findings should be provided to the lead investigator(s) and crime scene specialist. Mutual respect must be practiced by all investigative counterparts if a search is going to be fruitful and evidence obtained therefrom be of value in future court proceedings.
I'm unsure that dogs trampling all over stuff and one dog picking stuff up in its mouth (as witnessed at PdL with Eddie and Keela) counts?

The criticism of Grime at PdL (distinct from Eddie) is that Eddie had an alert response (continuous barking) not precise enough to indicate exactly what, in the gym and the inspection of clothing, he was alerting to; also that both dogs trampled over stuff and one picked stuff up in its mouth.

Neither dog at PdL should have been used to inspect clothing. Keela not, because, even though none was, had Madeleine's blood been found in minute traces on any clothing, that would not have been remotely incriminating. And Eddie did not possess an alert sufficiently precise to indicate individual items of clothing he might, or might not, have been alerting to.

User avatar
honestbroker1
Posts: 8052
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 8:50 pm

Re: Grime-watch ....

Post by honestbroker1 » Sat Apr 11, 2020 3:19 pm

Another clue of Grime's status in PdL.

Grime claims in his profile to be a 'subject matter' expert.

Subject matter expertise is something applicable to businesses:

https://www.thebalancecareers.com/subje ... rt-2275099

Post Reply